The Linux Foundation is a non-profit consortium dedicated to fostering the growth of Linux.
Attendance: Nick Stoughton (FSG ISO liaison), Matt Taggart (HP), Stuart Anderson (FSG), Mats Wichmann (Intel), Kevin Caunt (IBM), Marvin Heffler (IBM), Chris Johnson (Sun), Gordon !McFadden (Intel), Rajesh Banginwar (Intel)
Phone: Andrew Josey, Stew Benedict
Jim Zemlin presentation: 3pm Tuesday (US-CST)
Taggart: alien problem converting vsw4 rpm; Debian maintainer thinks this is a problem in the rpm itself (but has fixed the alien bug exposed)
Discussion of LSB 2.0: ISO Update: must track every change we've made since the ISO DIS 23360 submission. (Nov 10 - May 10 is the ballot period). In the US: ANSI (outsources to INCITS, Study Group on Linux (SGL), chaired by Dave Thewlis. Comments to SGL by mid-Feb, SGL will roll up US position by mid-March and propose to INCITS March-April). Comments not likely to come in until May. Votes can be: yes, yes-with-comments, or no-with-comments. May-June we evaluate list of comments - need to have editor's meeting. FSG can "vote" yes-with-comments to file. Editor will produce diffmarked version in April - make sure it's either in the US position or in the FSG Cat. A Liaison vote. Needs 50% JTC1 votes, 50% of those in favor.
Today certification version is too closely linked to spec version; can adjust this so that certification is against a series, but need to control the scope of changes very carefully.
The discussion evolved to creating a diagram of the relationship between different parts. The dia source is here. The concern is to minimize the number of "certification" boxes.
Discussion on naming of this release worked off this email from A.Josey
The workgroup wants to call this LSB 2.1.
Proposed Policy 0xx: LSB Specification Versioning Policy.
It should be noted this policy results in binary compatibility across major versions of the specification.
Due to ISO implications it is recommeneded that changes to the core or ISO-standardized modules need to be done with extreme care.
(file bug to include this in the specification once approved)
Tuesday afternoon: bugs
Discussion: if there's an admin module in the future, should it get "set" type commands that require privilege, or should they remain together with their "get" analogues (when there are paired sets)
Jim Zemlin presented.
how are we going to improve testing?
Morning Wednesday: setup stuff
Intel presentation
buildX machines
wiki
gforge
linux base
CVS
Bugzilla
libspec elf packaging graphics LSB Books Bookset | Sxx PPCxx generic IAXX | Intro baselib utillib commands execenv baselib.m4 libc.sgml libm.sgml ...
For building book
review ReleaseChecklist for information on LSB software releases.
Accessing the Database:
mysqladmin create lsb mysql -u root -p mysql>use lsb; ... tests to make sure mysqld is running mysql>q cd lsb/specdb make restore