From The Linux Foundation
[edit] LSB-Core 3.1 RC1 Release Notes
This is the bug dependency tree:
- 352 -data definitions sections are confusing.
- 363 -SUID Installer -- should or shall?.
- 403 -Additional Behaviors section needs something for EDEADLK tests and a few others.
- 726 -multiversion support for LSB commands.
- 863 -su specification about PATH is not clear and not followed by distributors.
- 865 -ISO Comment: __libc_start_main does not say what it does not appear to be properly documented..
- 867 -__cxa_atexit does not specify the order in which functions get called.
- 868 -stylesheet needs to put all TOC at the front of a bookset, not scattered through it.
- [-] 875 -AMD64 ELF document is empty!.
- 581 -Empty sections.
- 877 -Style: replaceable element in text format, lsb-core-arch.
- 878 -package noarch advice: "should" rather than "must".
- 894 -cron job specification is not tight enough.
- 896 -Script Naming conventions are inadequate.
- 900 -ISO confusion amongst LSB modules.
- 901 -Relationship to POSIX.
- 902 -ISO ballot procedure and style issues.
- 906 -Revision plans.
- 907 -ISO Version.
- 908 -Relationship to POSIX.
- 910 -Document style issues.
- 911 -Relationship to POSIX.
- 912 -ELF Introduction.
- 913 -FDL Intro.
- 914 -Packaging Intro.
- 915 -LSB Intro.
- 916 -Relationship to POSIX.
- 917 -Document style issues.
- 918 -Conformance Requirements.
- 919 -Definitions.
- 920 -FDL status.
- 921 -Locale additions.
- 922 -Document style issues.
- 923 -Document style issues.
- 924 -Document style issues.
- 925 -Document style issues.
- 926 -Stability.
- 927 -Document naming conventions.
- 928 -Future Directions.
- 929 -Depreacted interfaces.
- 930 -libc_start_main.
- 931 -eh_frame.
- 932 -Relationship to POSIX.
- 935 -Revision process.
- 936 -AMD64 should be replaced with x86-64.
- 937 -Maintenance plan.
- 938 -LSB Implementation Conformance.
- 939 -Backwards Compatibility.
- 940 -Locales.
- 941 -Missing Dynlnk types info.
- 942 -Empty Sections.
- 943 -Document style issues.
- 944 -curses.h blank lines in PPC32.
- 945 -typo -- PRocess should be Process.
- 946 -Definition of C Library.
- 947 -"does not" is not standardese.
- 948 -Intel IA 32 document titles.
- 949 -Language isue -- what does "be responsible" mean..
- 950 -libgcc_s generic wording deceptive.
- 953 -S390 book has PPC32 reference.
- 954 -source standard stuff need only be a note.
- 955 -What is __errno_location?.
- 956 -Various typographical errors.
- 957 -pam_open_session is a mess.
- 958 -more command -- do you mean /!??.
- 959 -dmesg -- what does 2.1.113 mean?.
- 960 -initactions - advice to users is a "shall".
- 968 -Naming rules are specified twice.
- 983 -Attempting to use unsupported instructions.
- 994 -Structure of call frame information.
- 1007 -init-functions - what does "print a ... message" mean?.
- 1014 -mklibspec column order.
- 1015 -Uses date in reference to ISO-C.
- 1017 -What does "listed above" mean?.
- 1018 -both __stpcpy and stpcpy are specified.
- 1035 -add xrefs for Additional Special Sections.
- 1036 -Does amd64 spec need to talk about medium model?.
- 1043 -Init script log_*_message inadequately specified.
- 1044 -pkgchk reporting errors when checking appbat packages.
- 1054 -Libpam --- what is a "service".
- [-] 1064 -Normative Reference rollup.
- 717 -X11 normative references don't point to specific specs.
- 933 -Normative References.
- 934 -Normative References - DWARF.
- 1013 -reference to LSB in normative references.
- 1071 -CMSG_NXTHDR truncated in socket.h.
- 1072 -enum xprt_stat not declared but used.
- 1075 -off_t should be signed, not unsigned.
- 1079 -libchk (classchk.c) unable to deal properly with "new" PPC64 ABI.
- 1081 -Linux special sections missing from specification.
- 1082 -What is LSDA?.
- 1086 -library section should say version tags are in archLSB.
- 1087 -wording on dynamic linker could be better.
- 1088 -Inconsistent references to arch LSB.
- 1089 -Are headers complete enough?.
- 1099 -DB has wrong header for htonl, htons, ntohl, and ntohs.