Computerworld: Linux Road Map Needed

Nicholas Petreley, until recently a skeptic of the LSB, shares his views on what he finds encouraging about recent developments in the Free Standards Group, the LSB 1.0 specification and the vendors who support it in this September 2001 Computerworld article:

Network World: New Linux Standard Base promises one app fits all

In this informative July 2001 article, Deni Connor of Network World interviews Alan Cox, Eric Raymond and an IT manager at a Chicago financial services software firm to get their views on the implications of LSB 1.0.
Here’s what they said:
A specification unveiled last week may hasten the day IT managers can buy a Linux application and be confident it will run on any vendor’s version of the open source operating system… Linux Programming Standards

Here is’s take on the release of LSB 1.0. The article takes note of the many vendors who have announced support for the LSB, and urges vendors and the community to take the next step of implementing the LSB and the LDPS.
An excerpt from the opinion piece: Ny standard forenkler Linux-programmering

News of the release of the first LSB specification reaches Norway in this July 4, 2001 article that appeared on (Note: Article appears in Norwegian.)

InfoWorld: First version of Linux programming standard released

Ed Scannell of InfoWorld covered the release of LSB 1.0 in this July 3, 2001 article that was syndicated throughout the network. He interviews a programmer working for “a large Houston-based oil company” on his views of why the LSB is important:

CNET: Linux standard eases programming

June 2, 2001 - CNET heralds the Free Standards Group’s release of version 1.0 of the Linux Standard Base (LSB) specification. We’ve done it! Hurray!
Highlights from the article:

An industry group has released the first version of a standard designed to make it easier to write Linux software by guaranteeing that different versions of Linux work similarly.

NewsForge: LSB within a month of first release

That sound you hear is the drumroll leading up to the widely anticipated release of LSB 1.0. NewsForge gets in on the action.
Tina Gasperson writes:

ZDNet: Giving Linux a home base

Evan Leibovitch continues his interpretation of the history of the LSB. He argues that “the LSB has been working on the tough and unsexy tasks of defining a standard, creating a sample implementation, and testing for compliance.” (Unsexy?) Evan also hits on several recent LSB milestones (LDPS 1.1, Li18nux, FHS 2.2), applauds the participation of The Open Group, and pines for the anticipated release of LSB 1.0. (For now, he says, “I think it has been correct to do it right rather than rush it.”)

CNET: Linux standardization efforts move ahead

CNET reports on the release of LDPS 1.1, as well as version 2.2 of the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard and version 0.6 of the LSB specification.
Excerpts from the article:

SD Times: Open Source Watch: Who’s In Charge Here?

SD Times has an interesting article by J.D. Hildebrand that lists what he views as the key “organized consortia, work groups and standard bodies” that “loosely govern” the open-source world. As of December 1, 2000, when the article was originally published, the Free Standards Group was at the top of his list (well, nearly).
Here’s how he describes the Free Standards Group:

Syndicate content